Theo Hartley — The Human PLAYBOOK
Parenting

"Mom didn't love me, so I don't love you"

Let me take this old cliché down from my psychology shelf, dust it off thoroughly, and place it in the middle of the feed:

Our romantic relationships re-stage our earliest relationships with our parents.

If I had to imagine your reactions to that ancient equation, I'd bet a third of you sigh in relief, a third mutter "nonsense" on reflex, and a third grab your heads and go pale.

No pressure. I'm about to explain — but first, a calming siren: psychological patterns are never absolutely true. They tend to come true. Usually. With high probability. There are always exceptions, and there is always the possibility of repair.

Back to the main road: how the parent-child bond shapes our love lives.

Think about it calmly and it's actually the logical outcome — all our patterns of relating to other people, our capacity to trust them, to believe they'll root for our growth — none of that came from thin air.

Our patterns of interaction are largely learned patterns, and we didn't learn them at university. It started much earlier. In the diaper years.

A baby is an adorable creature — and a clueless one. It knows nothing about other people or about itself. It doesn't know whether it is worthy or despised, loved or pitiful. Its only source of information on these fateful questions is the way its parents treat it.

And this goes exactly where you think it goes: if the bond with the parents is good, future romantic bonds tend to be good. If not — not. Again: not one hundred percent. But that's the trend.

Why does it happen? In one word: expectations.

The interactions between parent and child in the first year burn into the child's hard drive — unconsciously — the expectations it will carry into every adult bond. Those expectations divide roughly into three: expectations of the world, expectations of oneself, and expectations of other people.

When the early bond is good, sensitive, and responsive (what the literature calls secure attachment), the child's ledger of expectations reads: "This world is, on the whole, an interesting place worth exploring; I myself am a good creature worthy of love; and the people around me are basically fine — worth trusting, worth cooperating with."

And when the bond is unavailable — when the parents misread the child's needs, or simply neglect it — black stains spread across the ledger: "This world is a dangerous place; I am a defective creature only a fool would love; and the people around me should never be trusted, because they will always turn on me."

Not a picnic.

What makes this pattern lethal is that it is unconscious. It leaks into your romantic judgments, decisions, and interpretations, steers your choices — while you busy yourself building a collection of scribbled rationalizations that explain to the whole world why you're thirty-eight and have never had a relationship longer than two months.

(And don't tell me you "refuse to settle.")

When you're trapped inside the matrix called a self-fulfilling prophecy, it takes a serious accounting — and real courage — to look into the true mirror your relationships hold up.

Plenty of online priests will happily flatter you: you're special, you simply haven't found your soulmate yet (no such thing, by the way), believe and it will come.

But in truth, the very mental processes through which you learned to interpret the world are what lock you in the lonely trap, seemingly without exit.

So what do you actually do? Simple: take measured risks. Accept a certain dose of pain you weren't willing to feel until now.

The date is pleasant but bores you? Hold on. Try making the conversation interesting yourself.

The first intimacy was lukewarm? Wait for the third and fourth. Big idea: try communicating before, and during.

And the most common one — everything's going fine but there are no "butterflies" and you want to cut it off? Don't. Make a furious effort to stay curious, to invest, to show affection.

And don't flatter yourself that you're "fighting for the relationship." You are indeed fighting a total war — but in most cases, you are fighting the ungenerous picture you hold of yourself. In nastier phrasing: you are fighting your own low self-image.

One more thing, in a tone of loving menace: if someone dares to be enthusiastic about you — lights up at your touch, says how much she missed you — never, ever punish her for it. Don't shrink her, and don't let yourself treat her longing as a given. She may not know it, but your performed indifference is a thin mask over the panic that grips you when someone is excited about you.

And if mom didn't love you... it is very possible that your current partner does.

See you tomorrow. There is always a tomorrow.